Drawing for HOW THE RACE WAS WON

USPTO serial 88212954

HOW THE RACE WAS WON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6295774Status 700Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 16, 2021
Examiner
RISO, MARK E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 700: Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six.

Need help with HOW THE RACE WAS WON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*

Plus Government fees of $975

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Loletta Darden

Loletta Darden Darden IP Law PLLC2001 L St NWWashington, DC 20036United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable audio and video recordings featuring cycling, cross-country skiing, and endurance sports; downloadable images in the fields of cycling, cross-country skiing, and endurance sports; downloadable podcasts in the fields of cycling, cross-country skiing, and endurance sportsACTIVEMar 31, 2009
016Printed materials, namely, books, booklets, essays, articles, posters in the fields of cycling and endurance sportsACTIVEMar 31, 2009
041Providing a website featuring information in the fields of cycling, cross-country skiing, and endurance sports; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable videos, audio recordings, articles, and images in the fields of cycling, cross-country skiing, and endurance sports; Entertainment services in the nature of production and distribution of videos, audio recordings, and podcasts, in the fields of cycling, cross-country skiing, biathlon, running, and endurance sports; educational and entertainment services, namely, providing educational speakers in the fields of cycling, cross-country skiing, biathlon, running, and endurance sports; Providing information, news, and commentary in the field of sports, namely, cycling, cross-country skiing, and endurance sportsACTIVEMar 31, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2026E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2026REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2021R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 9, 2021SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2021CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jan 16, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2021ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2020CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 23, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 26, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 14, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 14, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 9, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 14, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 24, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 22, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2019GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2019GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2019EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Mar 7, 2019CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Mar 1, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance