USPTO serial 88213937
"WE DIDN'T INVENT THE MECHANIC'S LIEN, WE JUST PERFECTED IT!"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 17, 2019
- Examiner
- MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with "WE DIDN'T INVENT THE MECHANIC'S LIEN, WE JUST PERFECTED IT!"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Master Credit Consultants, Inc.
Cleveland, OH, US
Master Credit Consultants, Inc.
Cleveland, OH, US
Master Credit Consultants, Inc.
Cleveland, OH, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROGER D. EMERSON, Esq.
ROGER D. EMERSON, Esq. EMERSON THOMSON BENNETT1914 AKRON-PENINSULA ROADAKRON, OH 44313United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Construction liens and bond documentation services, namely, lien filing services and preparing and filing associated legal documents in the nature of notices to owner and preliminary notices | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Master Credit Consultants, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Master Credit Consultants, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Master Credit Consultants, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named "WE DIDN'T INVENT THE MECHANIC'S LIEN, WE JUST PERFECTED IT!"
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 1, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |