Drawing for SAPPHIRE DIGITAL

USPTO serial 88215685

SAPPHIRE DIGITAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAPPHIRE DIGITAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tamara A. Miller

Tamara A. Miller LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTD.TWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA, 180 N. STETSON AVESUITE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035providing call center services on behalf of health insurance companies, self-insured employers, and other self-insured entities to help facilitate consumers' selection of medical providers and medical facilitiesACTIVE—
042Software as a Service (SAAS) services, namely, providing software platforms to health insurance companies, self-insured employers, and other self-insured entities that help facilitate consumers' selection of medical providers and medical facilities; providing software development services and software consulting services to health insurance companies, self-insured employers, and other self-insured entities related to software platforms that help facilitate consumers' selection of medical providers and medical facilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 2, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2024EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2024EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 2, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 16, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 21, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 21, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 1, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 28, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 13, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 23, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 9, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 30, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 16, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 13, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 12, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 24, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 11, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 29, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 15, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 29, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance