USPTO serial 88216024
SIGHTSENTRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIGHTSENTRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSE I ROJAS
JOSE I ROJAS ROJASLAW201 S BISCAYNE BOULEVARD28TH FLOORMIAMI, FL 33131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices, apparatus, instruments, and equipment for the viewing, detection, diagnosis, management and treatment of retinal diseases, namely, macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), high Myopia and Glaucoma; medical devices, apparatus, instruments, and equipment for the viewing, detection, diagnosis, management and treatment of macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), high Myopia and Glaucoma and other eye conditions and diseases; optical coherence tomography devices and equipment for home use; medical devices, apparatus, instruments, and equipment for monitoring progression of eye conditions and diseases and in particular for use in the detection and characterization of patients with age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), high Myopia and Glaucoma; and parts and fittings for all the aforementioned goods; all of the foregoing excluding surgical medical equipment | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting a cloud-based platform that allows for uploading and analyzing test results; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring non-downloadable software and proprietary algorithms for analyzing optical coherence tomography imaging | ABANDONED | — |
| 044 | Medical services, including vision care services and eye care services; provision of optical medical services, ophthalmic services, and ophthalmic diagnostic services; patient rehabilitation care services; provision of medical second opinions; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to all of the aforementioned services; health care services, namely, providing interactive information services for health care professionals and patients; providing information relating to ophthalmic services and ophthalmic diagnostic services; providing a website and a database featuring medical information via online access to computer software and databases for use by medical and healthcare service providers and patients; providing interactive medical information services for receiving and providing patient-specific information to health care professionals | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2023 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 29, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |