USPTO serial 88216367
PELLICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWELL, MATTHEW P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PELLICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lutherville, MD
Rehoboth Beach, DE
Lutherville, MD
Rehoboth Beach, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ruy Garcia-Zamor
Ruy Garcia-Zamor GARCIA-ZAMOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, LLC12960 LINDEN CHURCH ROADCLARKSVILLE, MD 21029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Marketing services, namely, marketing the goods and services of others through creating physical and interactive experiences that engage sensory, emotional and cognitive attachments to brands through bespoke and technologically complex platforms comprising street marketing, youth marketing, event production, corporate, association, and government meetings, trade shows, sports marketing, PR and stunt marketing, kiosks and pop-up marketing, entertainment production, mobile marketing tours, marketing through amenities, festivals and concerts, product launches, brand activations, employee training and compliance, blogs, social networking, webcasts, crowdsourcing; marketing services, namely, utilizing digital programs, augmented reality, virtual reality, CGI, 360-degree video content, face and gesture recognition, holographic, 3D sensory imaging, wearables, touchscreens, geo-location, fabricated scenery and environments to promote product and brand engagement; business data analysis, namely, measuring the effectiveness of the experiential business initiatives gathered from digital programs, augmented reality, virtual reality, CGI, 360-degree video content, face and gesture recognition, holographic, 3D sensory imaging, wearables, touchscreens, geo-location, fabricated scenery and environments | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer system design services, namely, designing system for multi-media, multi-dimensional, two-way engagement for corporate, non-profit, association and government clients and their customers and employees; software design and development, namely, designing and developing software for multi-media, multi-dimensional, two-way engagement for corporate, non-profit, association and government clients and their customers and employees | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mahoney, Brian T
- Other trademarks owned by Chinnici, Joseph R
- Other trademarks owned by Mahoney, Brian T
- Other trademarks owned by Chinnici, Joseph R
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PELLICO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |