USPTO serial 88216790
SAY REX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALCIDO, JOHN CHARLES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAY REX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Music composition for others; Music composition services; Music production services; Music publishing services; Music selection services for use in television, film, radio and video games; Music transcription for others; Music video production; Composition of music for others; Consultation and advice regarding musical selections and arrangements for sound recordings and live performances; Educational services, namely, conducting on line and telephonic instruction and courses in the field music; Entertainment in the nature of an ongoing special variety, news, music or comedy show featuring music broadcast over television, satellite, audio, and video media; Entertainment services by a musical artist and producer, namely, musical composition for others and production of musical sound recordings; Entertainment services in the nature of live audio performances by Music; Entertainment services in the nature of live visual and audio performances by music; Entertainment services in the nature of live visual and audio performances, namely, musical band, rock group, gymnastic, dance, and ballet performances; Entertainment services in the nature of live visual and audio performances, namely, musical, variety, news and comedy shows; Entertainment services in the nature of live vocal performances by music; Entertainment services in the nature of live Music performances; Entertainment services in the nature of live performances by a musical artist ; Entertainment services, namely, providing advice and information for music, video and film concept and script development; Entertainment services, namely, providing non-downloadable playback of music via global communications networks; Entertainment services, namely, providing non- downloadable prerecorded music, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all on-line via a global computer network; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line reviews of music; Entertainment services, namely, live musical performances, provided by art galleries; Entertainment, namely, live music concerts; Live performances by a musical group; Multimedia publishing of books, magazines, journals, software, games, music, and electronic publications; Organization of exhibitions for musical entertainment; Planning arrangement of showing movies, shows, plays or musical performances; Post-production editing services in the field of music, videos and film; Presentation of musical performances; Production of music; Production of musical sound recording; Production of musical videos; Providing a website featuring entertainment information in the field(s) of music; Providing a website featuring information in the field of music and entertainment; Providing an Internet website portal featuring links to musical artist websites and music performance ticket information; Providing an Internet website portal in the field of music; Providing education courses in the field of music offered through online, non-downloadable videos and instructor assistance; Providing on-line videos featuring music, not downloadable; Publication of musical texts; Publishing of books, e-books, audio books, music and illustrations; Teaching in the field of music; Theatrical and musical floor shows provided at performance venues | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 3, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 7, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |