Drawing for SPECTRAL

USPTO serial 88219618

SPECTRAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHINN, LAUREN DONGMI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPECTRAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel Ravicher

Daniel Ravicher Ravicher Law Firm PLLC2000 Ponce De Leon Blvd Ste 600Coral Gables, FL 33134UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Sensors and measurement devices embedded in clothing and clothing for athletic use, namely, shirts, shorts, pants, capris, undershirts, sports bras, underwear and shoes, to be worn by a user, to acquire, process, store, transmit and provide visualization of biometric data of the user, all of the foregoing not for medical use; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for reviewing and analyzing biometric dataACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, shirts, shorts, pants, capris, undershirts, sports bras, underwear and shoes, containing sensors and devices, to be worn by a user to acquire, process, store, transmit and provide visualization of biometric data of the userACTIVE—
042Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to review and analyze biometric data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for reviewing and analyzing biometric dataACTIVE—
044Wellness and health-related consulting services regarding the collection and analysis of biometric dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 6, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 4, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 8, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 4, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 4, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 10, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 20, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 1, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 28, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 24, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 28, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance