Drawing for MR. TICKET

USPTO serial 88221916

MR. TICKET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MR. TICKET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Glenn E. Von Tersch

Glenn E. Von Tersch MU P.C.Suite 1353525 Del Mar HeightsSan Diego, CA 92130

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
045legal services; legal services, namely, criminal defense representation and defense of misdemeanor and infraction traffic citations; legal Services, namely, providing traffic ticket defense services and criminal defense servicesACTIVEJan 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 15, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 2, 2021GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2021GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2021CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 2, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 18, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2020GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2020GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2020CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 20, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 11, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance