Drawing for GOLDLYST

USPTO serial 88222228

GOLDLYST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LINDEMYER, ANKHI MUKHERJEA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLDLYST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Annette P. Heller

Annette P. Heller HELLER & ASSOCIATES400 CHESTERFIELD CENTERSUITE 400CHESTERFIELD [STLOUIS], MO 63017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring facial recognition software and software for storing and sharing personal information and data about individualsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 17, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 15, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 19, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 27, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 24, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 15, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 1, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance