Drawing for PERSONA

USPTO serial 88226643

PERSONA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NUNLEY, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERSONA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher L. Rasmussen

Christopher L. Rasmussen Inventus Law, PC.355 Bryant StreetSuite 403San Francisco, CA 94107

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable mobile application for computer services, namely, conducting interviews of on-line community for registered users to share human interest stories; computer software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; the aforementioned for use sharing human interest storiesACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely, electronic transmission of streamed and downloadable audio and video files via computer and other communications networks; transmission of video interviews via wireless communication networks and the Internet; video broadcasting services over the Internet or other communications network featuring the uploaded videos of others; communication services, namely, transmitting and receiving text, images, files, audio, video and audio-visual content and other data for the facilitation of communications between two or multiple users via computer networks, communication networks and the global information network; providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among users in the field of human interest stories; providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning interviews discussing human interest stories; providing Internet chat rooms; the aforementioned for use sharing human interest storiesACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for conducting interviews of on-line community for registered users to share human interest stories; online non-downloadable computer software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; providing an online non-downloadable Internet-based system application featuring technology enabling users to be interviewed for their human interest stories; providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to share human interest stories derived from interviews; computer services, namely, interactive hosting services which allow the users to publish and share their own content and images on-line; providing an on-line network environment featuring technology that enables users to share data in the field of personal human-interest stories; the aforementioned for use sharing human interest storiesACTIVE—
045On-line social networking services, namely, conducting interviews of on-line community for registered users to share human interest stories; providing information relating to diverse human cultures, beliefs, and lifestyles; interviewing individuals for the purpose of preserving their personal historiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 23, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 16, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 16, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 9, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 20, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 11, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2020ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 30, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 29, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 3, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 2, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance