USPTO serial 88227107
CFT RANSBURG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CFT RANSBURG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CARLISLE FLUID TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.
SCOTTSDALE, AZ
Carlisle Fluid Technologies, Inc.
Scottsdale, AZ
Carlisle Fluid Technologies, Inc.
Scottsdale, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nila Ray
Nila Ray FLETCHER YODER, P.C.11450 COMPAQ CENTER DRIVE W.BUILDING 9, SUITE 300HOUSTON, TX 77070Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | odor treatment equipment, namely, de-odorizing chemical preparations for preventing growth of organisms; unprocessed multicomponent synthetic resin; synthetic resin adhesives for industrial purposes; unprocessed epoxy resin for the preparation of clear coats, enamels and primers | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | coating materials, namely, electrostatic paints; coating compositions in the nature of paint containing thermosetting resins and thermoplastic resins used to coat metal products, for industrial applications; synthetic resin paints | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | odor treatment chemicals, namely, deodorizing chemical preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | electrostatic finishing equipment and other paint application equipment, namely, electrostatic coating apparatus and parts thereof and attachments and accessories for use therewith; namely, spray coating apparatus, electrostatic paint spray guns, painting and coating machinery and equipment, namely, painting robot, reciprocator for use with painting robot or paint guns; paint pumps; color changes valves for paint machines; compressed air guns for the extrusion of mastics; electric glue guns | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | high voltage supply units, electrical controls for electrostatic coating apparatus, high voltage electrodes for spray coating systems and electrostatic atomizing apparatus; photo sensors, high-voltage cables; low-voltage cables, pulse generators for testing electric current; electrical equipment, namely, controllers | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | odor treatment equipment, namely, exhaust fans | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | semi-processed multicomponent synthetic resin; semi-processed epoxy resin for the preparation of clear coats, enamels, and primers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARLISLE FLUID TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.
- Other trademarks owned by Carlisle Fluid Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Carlisle Fluid Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named CFT RANSBURG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 17, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |