USPTO serial 88227445
DIVITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NUNLEY, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIVITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas Panzer
DOUGLAS PANZER CAESAR RIVISE PC1635 MARKET ST 12TH FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Conducting guided tours of Italian wineries, vineyards, food manufacturing sites, gourmet restaurants, and specialty food markets; the aforementioned conducted by experts in the food, wine, and restaurant industries | ABANDONED | Dec 1, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |