Drawing for AIRSHIP

USPTO serial 88228980

AIRSHIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5832410Status 701Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 13, 2019
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary. Calendar the 10-year Section 8 and 9 combined renewal.

Status 701: Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary.

Need help with AIRSHIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Travis

Jennifer Travis FIFTH AVENUE LAW GROUP PLLC701 5TH AVENUESUITE 4200SEATTLE, WA 98104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and computer hardware sold as a unit for digital video management and analytics in the field of security surveillance; computer software for processing digital video files and digital recordings and for enabling optical character recognition, synchronization of digital audio and video, displaying video matrices, enabling facial recognition, enabling machine learning, enabling artificial intelligence and computer system networking, all in the field of security surveillance; computer software and computer hardware systems sold as a unit for the integration of digital audio and video images and geospatial data from digital video recorders, sonar devices, motion and sound sensors, radar devices, infrared motion sensors, drones, unmanned aerial vehicles, and, mobile robots, into computer software applications, all for use in the field of security surveillanceACTIVEFeb 28, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2025NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 20258.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Dec 5, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 2, 2025ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 6, 2025ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2024REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 8, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 28, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 22, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 8, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 5, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance