Drawing for RHINO CART

USPTO serial 88229029

RHINO CART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASTRO, GIANCARLO
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RHINO CART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. Arnold Jr.

PATRICK J ARNOLD JR MCANDREWS HELD & MALLOY LTD500 W MADISON 34TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60661UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012non-motorized carts for transporting heavy objectsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2020MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 16, 2020ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 16, 2020OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 16, 2020OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Dec 11, 2019OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 20, 2019ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 27, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance