Drawing for COOKOO + VAYA

USPTO serial 88230127

COOKOO + VAYA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUYKENDALL, LYNDSEY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with COOKOO + VAYA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeremy W. Miller

JEREMY W. MILLER DOWELL & DOWELL, P.C.2560 HUNTINGTON AVENUESUITE 203ALEXANDRIA, VA 22303

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016gift cards; gift certificatesACTIVE—
029chicken; meat; pork; prepared dishes consisting principally of meat; prepared meat; prepared salads; sausages; snack food dips; prepared dishes consisting principally of cheese; prepared dishes consisting principally of spinachINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
030biscuits and bread; bread; bread and buns; bread and pastry; bread rolls; confectionery ices; cookies; doughnuts; honey; pastries; pita bread; salad dressingsINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
032alcohol free wine; alcohol-free beers; beerINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
033wineINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
035administration of consumer loyalty programs; offering technical assistance in the establishment and operation of restaurant franchises; promoting the sale of goods and services through a consumer loyalty programINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
039delivery of food by restaurantsINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
043carry-out restaurants; catering services; restaurant services; restaurant services featuring take-out services; take-out restaurant servicesINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 9, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 13, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance