USPTO serial 88230404
WHAT A DIFFERENCE SCIENCE CAN MAKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WHAT A DIFFERENCE SCIENCE CAN MAKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vancouver, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa A. Nowak
Melissa A. Nowak Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600Seattle, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Live plants; living material for plant propagation, namely, seeds, cuttings, plant tissue and plant cells; none of the foregoing consisting of or derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Repository services for plant genetic resources, namely, storage of seeds, live plants, plant tissue culture material, and living plant propagation material, none of the foregoing consisting of or derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Contract laboratory services, namely, analytical chemistry and microbiology testing and research services in the field of plant science; Chemical, biochemical and microbiological analysis; Scientific research consultation, research and testing services in the field of horticulture; Consumer product safety testing services; Material testing; Testing of living plants, living plant propagation material and plant-derived products; Research and development of new products for others; Scientific research and development in the field of new plant varieties; none of the foregoing relating to cannabis or cannabis derivatives with a delta-9 THC concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Plant nursery services; Cultivation and propagation of live plants and living plant propagation materials; Providing information concerning plant identification for horticultural purposes; Consultation in the field of horticulture; Services for the development of new plant varieties in the nature of plant breeding; none of the foregoing relating to cannabis or cannabis derivatives with a delta-9 THC concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Anandia Laboratories Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named WHAT A DIFFERENCE SCIENCE CAN MAKE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |