USPTO serial 88230653
BELLUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWDER-SCHAEFER, ANDREW W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BELLUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chino Hills, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Bracelets; Bracelets of precious metal; Earrings; Jewellery; Jewellery and imitation jewellery; Jewellery and precious stones; Jewellery chains; Jewellery plated with precious metals; Jewellery, including imitation jewellery and plastic jewellery; Jewelry; Jewelry and imitation jewelry; Jewelry chains; Jewelry charms; Jewelry for the head; Jewelry making kits; Jewelry plated with gold; Jewelry plated with silver; Jewelry plated with rhodium; Jewelry plated with rose gold; Jewelry watches; Jewelry, namely, anklets; Jewelry, namely, arm cuffs; Jewelry, namely, bracelets, wristbands and necklaces that also provides notification to the wearer of a pending medical related task; Jewelry, namely, collar tips of common metal; Jewelry, namely, collar tips of precious metal; Jewelry, namely, magnetic necklaces; Jewelry, namely, magnetic pendants; Jewelry, namely, stone pendants; Rings made in whole or significant part of sterling silver; Rings made in whole or significant part of stainless steel; Rings made in whole or significant part of brass; Rings made in whole or significant part of copper; Rings made in whole or significant part of titanium; Rings made in whole or significant part of tungsten; Rings made in whole or significant part of gold; Rings made in whole or significant part of white gold; Agate as jewellery; Ankle bracelets; Bangle bracelets; Bead bracelets; Beard jewelry in the nature of jewelry for use in a beard; Body jewelry; Bracelets; Bracelets and jewelry featuring electronic chips for attracting energy to the body wherein the electronic chips increase in power in the presence of electromagnetic fields, for the purpose of re-balancing the human energy field; Broaches being jewelry; Charm bracelets; Charms for jewelry; Choker necklaces; Clip earrings; Costume jewelry; Cuff bracelets; Diamond jewelry; Drop earrings; Engagement rings; Gemstone jewelry; Gold-plated earrings; Gold-plated rings; Hair jewelry in the nature of jewelry for use in the hair; Hoop earrings; Imitation jewellery; Jade; Jewellery chain of precious metal for bracelets; Leather jewelry and accessory boxes; Marcasite jewelry; Necklace and earring combinations that can be worn separately or as one piece; Necklaces; Pearls; Rings; Rings being jewelry; Stainless steel jewelry bracelets; Watch bracelets; Watches, clocks, jewelry and imitation jewelry; Wedding rings | ACTIVE | Jun 10, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |