USPTO serial 88233405
DOSSIER D
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOVELACE, JAMES B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOSSIER D?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Furr
Jeffrey M. Furr FURR LAW FIRM2622 DEBOLT ROADUTICA, OH 43080UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software applications for collecting and organizing documents about a particular person and events, monitoring competence requirements, organizing training activities, offering compliance and talent management solutions, helping customers demonstrate learning towards internal and external regulatory standards; Computer programs, recorded, for collecting and organizing documents about a particular person and events, monitoring competence requirements, organizing training activities, offering compliance and talent management solutions, helping customers demonstrate learning towards internal and external regulatory standards; Downloadable computer programs for collecting and organizing documents about a particular person and events, monitoring competence requirements, organizing training activities, offering compliance and talent management solutions, helping customers demonstrate learning towards internal and external regulatory standards; Electronic notice boards; Downloadable electronic publications, namely, journals, articles, books, magazines in the field of competence development technologies, business analysis, and compliance reporting; Electronic database in the field of competence development technologies, business analysis, and compliance reporting recorded on computer media | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational academies, namely, providing classes, courses, workshops in the field of monitoring competence requirements, competence development technologies, business analysis, compliance reporting, compliance and talent management solutions, internal and external regulatory standards; Arranging and conducting workshops in the field of monitoring competence requirements, competence development technologies, business analysis, compliance reporting, compliance and talent management solutions, internal and external regulatory standards; Providing a web site featuring non-downloadable instructional videos in the field of monitoring competence requirements, competence development technologies, business analysis, compliance reporting, compliance and talent management solutions, internal and external regulatory standards; Providing information about education; Teaching services, namely, classes, courses, workshops in the field of monitoring competence requirements, competence development technologies, business analysis, compliance reporting, compliance and talent management solutions, internal and external regulatory standards; Arranging and conducting of educational conferences; Arranging and conducting seminars in the field of monitoring competence requirements, competence development technologies, business analysis, compliance reporting, compliance and talent management solutions, internal and external regulatory standards; Providing on-line non-downloadable electronic publications, namely, journals, articles, books, magazines in the field of competence development technologies, business analysis, and compliance reporting | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer system design; Server hosting; Monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning, and for testing or quality control purposes to ensure compliance with competence requirements, competence development technologies, internal and external regulatory standards; Research and development of new products for others; Providing search engines for the internet; Computer software consultancy; Conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; Rental of web servers; Updating of computer software; Cloud computing featuring software for collecting and organizing documents about a particular person and events, monitoring competence requirements, organizing training activities, offering compliance and talent management solutions, helping customers demonstrate learning towards internal and external regulatory standards; Information technology consultancy; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software collecting and organizing documents about a particular person and events, monitoring competence requirements, organizing training activities, offering compliance and talent management solutions, helping customers demonstrate learning towards internal and external regulatory standards; Rental of computer software; Maintenance of computer software; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for collecting and organizing documents about a particular person and events, monitoring competence requirements, organizing training activities, offering compliance and talent management solutions, helping customers demonstrate learning towards internal and external regulatory standards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DOSSIER SOLUTIONS AS
- Other trademarks owned by DOSSIER SOLUTIONS AS
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DOSSIER D
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 11, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |