USPTO serial 88234487
AUTOMOTIVE.TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS-RIGGS, LESLIE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTOMOTIVE.TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID W GRACE
DAVID W GRACE LOEB & LOEB LLP10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD, SUITE 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Broadcasting of video and audio programming over the Internet; Internet broadcasting services; video broadcasting services via the Internet; streaming of audio, visual, and audiovisual material via the Internet; video-on-demand transmission services via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, ongoing television programs in the field of automobiles; entertainment services, namely, ongoing entertainment multimedia programs presented on the Internet in the field of automobiles; providing ongoing entertainment multimedia programs in the field of automobiles accessible by satellite, television, Internet, wireless networks, and through transmission of audio and/or video signals to any type of visual display device; production and distribution of television shows | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2019 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 20, 2019 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 20, 2019 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |