USPTO serial 88235304
REELS N ROWS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REELS N ROWS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeanine M. Mitchell
Jeanine M. Mitchell Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.10220 Aristocrat WayLas Vegas, NV 89135UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software for gambling machines; computer game software for gaming machines, namely, slot machines and video lottery terminals; games that accept virtual or monetary wagers sold as a feature of game software; downloadable computer software and firmware for playing games of chance on any computerized platform, including dedicated gaming consoles, video based slot machines, reel based slot machines, video lottery terminals, hand held devices, mobile and wireless communication devices, and internet enabled devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named REELS N ROWS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 19, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |