Drawing for INGENUITY IN MOTION

USPTO serial 88235513

INGENUITY IN MOTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARROW, MARY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INGENUITY IN MOTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Doug Johnson

Doug Johnson Miller & Martin PLLC832 Georgia AvenueSuite 1200 Volunteer BuildingChattanooga, TN 37402-2289

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011energy storage plantsACTIVE—
012unmanned surface vessels being autonomous underwater vehicles; unmanned aerial vehicles; electric surface vessels, namely, remotely controlled vessels, unmanned surface vessels, unmanned commercial vessels, robotic vessels; unmanned hydrographic vessels, namely, dredgers, drill ships, survey vessels, water quality monitoring vessels, environmental cleanup vessels, ocean engineering vessels, research vessels, scientific vessels, ice breakers; unmanned surveillance vessels, namely, unmanned patrol vessels, unmanned security vessels, unmanned police vessels, unmanned naval vessels, and unmanned search and rescue vessels; autonomous commercial vessels, namely, autonomous fishing vessels, autonomous crew boats, autonomous shuttles, autonomous offshore oil vessels, autonomous workboats, autonomous tow boatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2022EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2022EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 23, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 2, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2022EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2022EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 29, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 10, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 30, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 30, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 30, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 28, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 8, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2021NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 7, 2021DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 4, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 1, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 20, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 20, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 8, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2020EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Sep 8, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 20, 2020ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 11, 2019ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 8, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 3, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance