USPTO serial 88235864
VITASTIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VITASTIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodbridge, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A.W. Wong
David A.W. Wong Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204-3535UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | vitamins and nutritional supplements for general health and well-being | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2024 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |