USPTO serial 88236990
WORKTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, JULIE H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WORKTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Syracuse, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Nocilly
David L. Nocilly BOND SCHOENECK & KING, PLLCONE LINCOLN CENTERSYRACUSE, NY 13202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Asbestos clothing for protection against fire; Asbestos gloves for protection against accidents; Clothing for protection against accidents, irradiation and fire; Dust protective goggles and masks; Eye covers for protective purposes; Face-protection shields; Fire resistant gloves; Garments and clothes for protection against fire; Gloves for protection against accidents; Insulated clothing for protection against accident or injury; Knee pads for workers; Protection masks; Protective ear covering shields; Protective eyewear; Protective glasses; Protective gloves for industrial use; Protective helmets; Protective padded clothing for protection against bodily harm and blunt force trauma; Protective work gloves; Reflective clothing, for the prevention of accidents; Reflective safety vests; Safety eyewear; Safety goggles; Safety helmets; Safety products, namely, reflective safety bands to be worn on the body; Support belts for workers | ACTIVE | Sep 17, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2020 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |