USPTO serial 88238032
MIFENGDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRENNAN, KEVIN GERARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIFENGDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shen Zhen, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM SCOTT GOLDMAN
WILLIAM SCOTT GOLDMAN GOLDMAN LAW GROUP1300 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W.; STE. 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Candle extinguishers; Candle extinguishers and candlesticks not of precious metal; Candle extinguishers and candlesticks of precious metal; Candle extinguishers, not of precious metal; Candle holders; Candle holders not of precious metal; Candle holders of precious metal; Candle jars; Candle rings; Candle rings of precious metal; Candle snuffer and tray combination; Candle snuffer and tray combination made in whole or in part of precious metal; Candle snuffers; Candle snuffers not of precious metal; Candle snuffers of precious metal; Vinyl place mats; Abrasive liner for cat litter boxes; Artificial eggs; Baby bathtubs; Barware, namely, seltzer bottles; Basting spoons; Basting spoons; Bath accessories, namely, cup holders; Bath brushes; Bath products, namely, body sponges; Bath products, namely, loofah sponges; Bath products, namely, natural sea sponges; Billiard table brushes; Bird feeders; Bottle stands; Cake pans; Candle rings not of precious metal; Candy jars sold empty; Canister sets; Canteens; Car washing mitts; Carafes; Cat litter pans; Cauldrons; Caviar coolers; Ceramic figurines; Champagne buckets; Cheese covers; Cheese graters; Chocolate molds; Clay floor vases; Clay pots; Cleaning brushes for barbecue grills; Cleaning cloths; Cleaning combs; Cleaning mitts of fabric; Cleaning sponges; Clothes drying racks; Clothes pins; Coffee mugs; Compost containers for household use; Cookery molds; Cookie sheets; Cooking pots; Cooking utensils, namely, barbecue branders; Cooking utensils, namely, grill covers; Cooking utensils, namely, wire baskets; Cork holders; Cosmetic brushes; Countertop holders for paper towels; Cream and sugar set; Crockery, namely, pots, dishes, drinking cups and saucers, bowls, serving bowls and trays; Crushers for kitchen use, non-electric; Cup cake molds; Cups; Curry combs; Dishwashing brushes; Disposable latex gloves for general use; Disposable plastic gloves for general use; Dog food scoops; Drinking cups sold with lids therefor; Drinking glasses, namely, tumblers; Dryer balls sold empty used to disperse disinfectants to articles in a dryer; Dust bins; Egg cups; Electric face cleansing brushes; Electric hot combs; Electrically-heated hair brushes; Empty spray bottles; Exfoliating slippers; Facial sponges for applying make-up; Feather brooms; Feather dusters; Flavored toothpicks; Floor vases; Flower baskets; Flower bowls; Funnels, namely, sprues of wax for jewelry casting; Garbage cans; Garbage pails; Garden hose sprayers; Glass floor vases; Grill scrapers; Hand-operated coffee grinders; Hot air hair brushes; Household scouring pads; Household utensils, namely, graters; Ice cream scoops; Laundry hampers for domestic or household use; Lint rollers; Lunch boxes made of metal; Lunch boxes made of plastic; Melon ballers; Mop wringers; Napkin dispensers for household use; Non-electric coffee makers; Non-electric meat grinders; Non-electric wall sconces; Non-electric warmers for use with tea candles to melt scented wax tarts; Opal glass; Opaline glass; Pails; Pastry boards; Pastry molds; Pillar candle plate made in whole or in part of precious metal; Pillar candle plates; Plastic juice box holders; Porcelain flower pots; Raised garden planters; Recipe boxes; Rinsing pails; Ritual flower vases; Serving trays, namely, cabarets; Shower racks; Soap boxes; Soap brackets; Soap containers; Soap holders; Sponges used for applying make-up; Sprayers attached to garden hoses; Spun glass; Squeegees; Squeegees for dishes; Squeegees for shaving brushes; Stained glass figurines; Stone floor vases; Tart scoops; Tea pots not of precious metal; Thermal insulated wrap for cans to keep the contents cold or hot; Toiletry sponges; Toothbrush head covers; Toothpick holders; Trash containers for household use; Trays for use in fingernail polishing; Votive candle holders; Window boxes | ACTIVE | Jul 23, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |