USPTO serial 88238292
PRECISIONLENDER L3
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORNWELL, ANDREA B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRECISIONLENDER L3?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John D. Gilbertson
John D. Gilbertson Zarley Law Firm, P.L.C.400 Locust StreetCapital Square, Suite 400Des Moines, IA 50309-2350Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for interfacing with an artificial intelligence system, machine learning computer system, cognitive computing system, or other analysis engine being analytical computer systems; computer software for interfacing with a cognitive, learning and analytical computer system; extensible computer software platform to allow users to interact with an artificial intelligence system and/or cognitive, learning or other analytical computer system; computer software facilitating adaptive intelligent coaching in connection with an artificial intelligence system, machine learning computer system, cognitive computing system, or other analysis engine being analytical computer systems; computer software facilitating extensible problem solving and analysis with an artificial intelligence system, machine learning computer system, cognitive computing system, or other analysis engine being analytical computer systems; computer software to interface with an artificial intelligence system, machine learning computer system, cognitive computing system, or other analysis engine being analytical computer systems, including the facilitation of data gathering for purposes of allowing an artificial intelligence system, machine learning computer system, cognitive computing system, or other analytical computer systems to analyze data and for communicating such analysis back to the user; computer software to facilitate data gathering, collection and transmission to an artificial intelligence system, machine learning computer system, cognitive computing system, or other analysis engine being analytical computer systems, and to facilitate the communication of the resulting analysis back to the user; computer software to facilitate a user's communication through natural language to an artificial intelligence system, machine learning computer system, cognitive computing system, or other analysis engine being analytical computer systems, and to facilitate the communication of the resulting analysis back to the user in natural language; computer software to provide a platform-agnostic interface to an artificial intelligence system, machine learning computer system, cognitive computing system, or other analysis engine being analytical computer systems; computer software to provide an industry-agnostic interface to an artificial intelligence system, machine learning computer system, cognitive computing system, or other analysis engine being analytical computer systems; computer software to provide an application-agnostic interface to an artificial intelligence system, machine learning computer system, cognitive computing system, or other analysis engine being analytical computer systems; computer software facilitating the transmission of questions to an artificial intelligence system, machine learning computer system, cognitive computing system, or other analysis engine being analytical computer systems, and to facilitate the transmission of human-like responses to such questions; all of the foregoing for use by financial institutions in the delivery of services namely, financial services in connection with issuing lines of credit, credit processing, default mitigation and financial advisory services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for providing loan and deposit pricing management solutions to lenders through a web-based tool; Data automation and collection service using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze and collect service data in the field of commercial lending; Software as a Service (SAAS) Software which analyzes risk, for use by financial institutions in the delivery of services namely, financial services in connection with issuing lines of credit, credit processing, default mitigation and financial advisory services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lender Performance Group, LLC DBA PrecisionLender
- Other trademarks owned by Lender Performance Group, LLC DBA PrecisionLender
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PRECISIONLENDER L3
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |