USPTO serial 88238315
SUNRISE BROKERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELMAN, JESSE M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUNRISE BROKERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALEXANDRA MARTINEZ
Jill K. Tomlinson KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP1100 PEACHTREE STREET, SUITE 2800MAILSTOP: IP DOCKETING - 22Atlanta, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial analysis and consulting; financial forecasting; none of the aforesaid for banking services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2020 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |