USPTO serial 88240155
EATSAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BECK, LORETTA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EATSAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin Brown
Justin Brown Brown Brothers Law, LLP1827 harley driveann arbor, MI 48103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing food safety using data and analytics; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for collect and present information on food safety from many data sources; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for finding and rating food establishments by guests; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for establishment owner to improve food safety, guest experience and perceptions; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for food safety data management platform; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for that uses data science to calculate and predict overall safety of patrons while visiting a food establishment; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for food safety data science and analytics platform; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for improving food safety and dining experience; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use to managing food safety using data and analytics; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use to collect and present information on food safety from many data sources; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use by using data science to calculate and predict overall safety of patrons while visiting a food establishment; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use for finding and rating food establishments by guests; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use for establishment owner to improve food safety, guest experience and perceptions; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use for food safety data management; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use for food safety data science and analytics platform; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use for improving food safety and dining experience; Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software that uses data science to calculate and predict overall safety of patrons while visiting a food establishment; Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the purpose of collect and present information on food safety from many data sources; Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the purpose of finding and rating food establishments by guests; Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the purpose of establishment owner to improve food safety, guest experience and perceptions; Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the purpose of providing a food safety data management platform; Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the purpose of providing a food safety data science and analytics platform; Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the purpose of improving food safety and dining experience; Computer services, namely, providing customized web pages featuring user-defined information; Designing and creating web sites for others; Designing and developing websites in the field of small and large food establishments for managing food safety and experience and engaging customers; Environmental testing and inspection services; Providing a secure, web-based service featuring technology that enables individuals to remotely create and manage their own accounts so that whatever private content they upload now can be encrypted, then delivered to their intended recipients, at the time and in the manner requested; Rental of computers and software | ACTIVE | Feb 9, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2019 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2019 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2019 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |