USPTO serial 88240664
CANNABULL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TARCU, CATHERINE L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CANNABULL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PITTSBURGH, PA
PITTSBURGH, PA
PITTSBURGH, PA
PITTSBURGH, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JARED N LELAND
JARED N LELAND HOUSTON HARBAUGH PC401 LIBERTY AVENUE 22ND FLOORPITTSBURGH, PA 15222UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Nutritional products for human consumption, namely, grain-based food bars containing certain hemp-derived products in the nature of hulled hemp seeds, hemp seed proteins, and hemp seed oils; all of the foregoing shall exclude energy-giving products as well as products marketed and promoted as energy-giving and energy-stimulating products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TROMBLEY, MATTHEW
- Other trademarks owned by THOMAS, CHRISTOPHER
- Other trademarks owned by TROMBLEY, MATTHEW
- Other trademarks owned by THOMAS, CHRISTOPHER
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CANNABULL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 18, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 8, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2021 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2020 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |