Drawing for INVISION

USPTO serial 88243234

INVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LEKHA GOPALAKRISHNAN

LEKHA GOPALAKRISHNAN WINSTEAD PC2728 North Harwood Street, Suite 500Dallas, TX 75201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Data analysis for oil and gas operations, well stimulation operations, well workover operations, well staging operations, wireline operations, fishing operations, coiled tubing operations, snubbing operations and well blow-out prevention operations, namely, performing oil well diagnostics for diagnosing and troubleshooting problems, mitigating the risk, and improving the efficiency of well stimulation operations, well workover operations, well staging operations, wireline operations, fishing operations, coiled tubing operations, snubbing operations and well blow-out prevention operationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 7, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 6, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 6, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 24, 2023EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 10, 2023GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Feb 10, 2023GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Feb 10, 2023CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Jan 9, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 17, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 17, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 17, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 17, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 17, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 10, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2021ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 12, 2021GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 12, 2021GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 12, 2021CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 12, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 11, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 29, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 15, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 20, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance