Drawing for AI CENTER OF EXCELLENCE

USPTO serial 88243268

AI CENTER OF EXCELLENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERLIN, JUSTIN E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AI CENTER OF EXCELLENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan A. Menkes

Jonathan A. Menkes KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN STREET, 14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business information services in the nature of providing information on business opportunities in the field of computer science; Business consultation services for freelancers, start-ups, existing businesses and non-profits to support one another's growth and development in the fields of business innovation process, computer systems, and computer science; Incubation services, including providing work space containing business equipment to emerging, start-up and existing companies; Arranging and conducting business conferences for freelancers, startups, existing businesses and non-profits; Business development services; Business development services, including providing start-up support for businesses of others; Business consultation services in the field of research and development of business innovation processes; Providing information related to research and development services in the field of business innovation processesACTIVE—
042Research and development services in the field of computer systems, computer science; Providing technology information related to research and development services in the fields of computer systems, computer scienceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 19, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 30, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 8, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 1, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance