USPTO serial 88244151
HIGH FIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MUNN LEWIS, LAKEISHA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HIGH FIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Colony, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
REBECCA LIEBOWITZ
REBECCA LIEBOWITZ VENABLE LLPP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Pizza for consumption on or off the premises | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 3, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2024 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 22, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 7, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 8, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 8, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 8, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 1, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |