USPTO serial 88244179
BEACH COUTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 17, 2024
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with BEACH COUTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS D FOSTER
THOMAS D FOSTER TDFOSTER - INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW11622 EL CAMINO REAL, SUITE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92130United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Bikinis, Bottoms as clothing, Beach Hats, Footwear, Hats, Headwear, Swim suits, Swim trunks, Swimwear, T-Shirts, Tank tops, Tops as clothing, Surf caps, Silk Sarongs, Beach Clothes, namely, shirts, beach coverups, and beach sweaters | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2024 | NRCS | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 15, 2024 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2024 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Jul 3, 2024 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2024 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2024 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 28, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 28, 2024 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 21, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 20, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 20, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2023 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 10, 2023 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 10, 2023 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2022 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 25, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 18, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 24, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |