Drawing for RRT RAPID RECHARGE TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 88244980

RRT RAPID RECHARGE TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RRT RAPID RECHARGE TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew P. Hintz

Matthew P. Hintz Lowenstein Sandler LLPOne Lowenstein DriveRoseland, NJ 07068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Emergency jump start apparatus, namely, battery jump starters; batteries; lithium iron phosphate batteries; rechargeable vehicle batteries; batterypacks for vehicles; starter battery charging devices for vehicles; battery charge and performance monitors; battery jump starter apparatus; jump starter cables; rechargeable battery system to provide backup power for vehicles comprised of a battery, a secondary charging input, and a switching circuit to connect the secondary charging input to the battery; integrated battery backup systems for vehicles comprising an emergency battery, an isolator configured for recharging the internal battery via the vehicle's alternator, a circuit to measure and balance cell voltage and a processor controlled by computer code to monitor cell voltage and direct power supply to the internal battery from the alternatorACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 11, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 9, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 22, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 17, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 12, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance