Drawing for MTRO

USPTO serial 88248641

MTRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGER, MELANIE ALYSSA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MTRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer L. Day

JENNIFER L. DAY BOSE MCKINNEY & EVANS LLP111 MONUMENT CIRCLESUITE 2700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Earbuds; Earphones; Headphones; Audio headphones; Music headphones; Noise cancelling headphones; Personal headphones for use with sound transmitting systems; Stereo headphonesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 20, 2025ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 21, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2025LOPELETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED - ACTION TAKEN—
Jan 21, 2025JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 13, 2024LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Dec 5, 2024PBPOWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST—
Oct 15, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 7, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 19, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 24, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 8, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 6, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 13, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 8, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 26, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 25, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 26, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 24, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 6, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 6, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 6, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 6, 2019LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 9, 2019LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Mar 22, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 21, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance