Drawing for VINLIST

USPTO serial 88249153

VINLIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAGLINI, KAREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VINLIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan M. Natland

Susan M. Natland KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN STREET, 14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recorded computer operating software; Downloadable computer software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; Downloadable mobile applications for vehicle diagnostics, detection and maintenance; Vehicle detection equipment, namely, display monitors, computers, image sensors, video cameras, and operating system and application software to detect vehicle location; Interactive touch screen terminals; Data processing apparatus; Blank integrated circuit cards, namely, blank smart cards; Automotive testing equipment, namely, handheld diagnostic scanners; Measuring instrumentation and apparatus, namely, digitizers; Navigation apparatus for vehicles, on-board computersACTIVE—
042Computer software design; Computer system design; Creating and maintaining web sites for others; Installation of computer software; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in field of detect breakdowns; Data encryption services; Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; Updating of computer software; Monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning; Off-site data backup; Vehicle roadworthiness testing; Providing information on computer technology and programming via a web site; Electronic data storage; Monitoring of computer systems to detect breakdowns; Data conversion of computer programs and data, not physical conversionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 26, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance