USPTO serial 88255234
BEAUTY SG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OPUTA, CHIOMA N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEAUTY SG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary and nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 9, 2020 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |