USPTO serial 88257267
MIQ THINK BEYOND.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JAGANNATHAN, SIDDHARTH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIQ THINK BEYOND.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising, marketing and promotional services; advertising campaign services; advertising services provided via a database; digital advertising services; collection of information relating to advertising; response advertising; preparation and realisation of media and advertising plans and concepts; evaluating the impact of advertising on audiences; providing assistance to management in commercial enterprises in respect of advertising and marketing; marketing campaigns; marketing analysis, forecasting, research and advice; provision of marketing reports and studies; planning, development and implementation of marketing strategies and concepts for others; arranging and conducting of marketing promotional events for others; developing promotional campaigns for businesses; design of marketing surveys; sales promotion services; management assistance for promoting businesses; product marketing services; product launch services; business analysis, research and information services; business assistance, management and administrative services; acquisition of business information relating to company activities; business consultation and management relating to marketing activities; computerised business information processing services; computerised business information retrieval; collection and systemisation of information into computer databases; data collection services; data processing services for business purposes; data retrieval services; management and compilation of computerised databases; brand evaluation services; brand value management advice and consultancy; creation of brand strategy; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to all the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 19, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 20, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |