USPTO serial 88257312
TEK EXPERTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEK EXPERTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems; technical support services, namely, remote administration and management of in-house and hosted datacenter devices; technical support services, namely, technical advice related to the repair of software; technical support services, namely, technical advice related to the installation of software; software design and development services; computer software development; computer software development and computer programming development for others; development of software for secure network operations; design and development of computer software; design and development of on-line computer software systems; computer software development in the field of personnel management systems; computer software development in the field of operational talent management systems; software development for others in the field of software configuration management; development, updating and maintenance of software and database system; design, development, and implementation of software for personnel data management and personnel utilization; design and development of computer software for the improvements of purchasing functions of business; developing computer software; developing customized software for others; development of customized software for others for use in risk assessment, information security, business analysis, audit and audit planning, and sales management; maintenance of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; updating of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, analyzing, and maintaining applications, software, and web sites, of others in the fields of employee productivity and risk management; all of the aforementioned exclusive of design and integration of internal computer and voice technology systems | ACTIVE | Sep 9, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2019 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 13, 2019 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Apr 6, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |