USPTO serial 88259197
EELEXA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLLOPY, DIANE PATRICIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 137
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EELEXA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sugar Land, TX, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric food blenders; electric juice extractors; electric food processor; electric mixers for food | ACTIVE | Oct 26, 2018 |
| 009 | Apparatus and instruments for checking, supervision, monitoring, viewing, recording, transmission, processing or reproduction of sound and images and apparatus and instruments for controlling and transmitting video, audio and communication signals and information via wires or wireless means, namely, video-audio signal distributors, video-audio signal switchers and matrix switchers, video picture quality enhancers for noise reduction, video and audio processors, RF signal processors, special effects generators in the nature of an electronic device for split screens, video encoders and decoders being integrated circuits, electronic video signal scalers, color processors for modifying video color, audio signal defect correctors, video screen splitters and video time base signal delay correctors being devices used to reduce or eliminate errors caused by mechanical instability in analog recordings, video-audio signal distributors, video-standard converters, scan converters in the nature of devices for converting video signal from personal computers to video recorders, video standard input signal converters, video time base correctors being devices used to reduce or eliminate errors caused by mechanical instability in analog recordings, computer genlock (generator locking) equipment, namely, genlock (generator locking) device for synchronizing graphics and text overlay on video recordings, computer controlled video equipment, namely, control panels for use with video projection apparatus, computer interface products for use in converting audio and video signals from analog to digital, namely, TTL (transistor-transistor logic) analog encoders, TTL (transistor-transistor logic) to analog converters, TTL (transistor-transistor logic) genlock (generator locking) encoder cards, room control devices, namely, electric switch wall plates and table bus bars in the nature of electric current distributors embedded within infra-red, ethernet, wireless network and controlling devices, audio signal defect correctors, twisted pair RF signal transmitters and receivers, video screen splitters and video time base signal delay correctors being devices to reduce delay between origin and destination devices, electrical cables and wires, centrally-controlled audio-video system used for controlling multimedia source in the nature of video projectors, computers, and DVD players comprised of video projectors, audio speakers, and downloadable computer software for controlling the functions of the projectors and speakers, Flat-panel display screens, furniture-mounted connection bus featuring a power source, universal power sockets, video, audio, telephone and ethernet connectors, Downloadable computer software for operating flat-panel display screens | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online, temporary use of non-downloadable software platform for operating a video projection device | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 29, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 30, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |