Drawing for COGNITIVE DIVIDEND

USPTO serial 88262726

COGNITIVE DIVIDEND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSS, KATHERINE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COGNITIVE DIVIDEND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pamela Hirschman

Pamela Hirschman SHERIDAN ROSS P.C.1560 BROADWAY, SUITE 1200DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software development tools; Downloadable software in the nature of artificial intelligence for software development, namely, natural language assistant for use in analyzing, normalizing, querying, filtering, evaluating, understanding, and manipulating source code and conveying information about the source code to human collaboratorsACTIVE—
042Computer software consulting; Computer software development; Creating, maintaining, and modernizing computer software; Research, development, design and upgrading of computer software; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software development tools; Non-downloadable cloud-based computer software development tools; Non-downloadable cloud-based software in the nature of artificial intelligence for software development, namely, natural language assistant for use in analyzing, normalizing, querying, filtering, evaluating, understanding, and manipulating source code and conveying information about the source code to human collaborators; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for computer software development toolsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2022EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2022EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 22, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2022EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 11, 2022EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 11, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Aug 25, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 28, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 11, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 11, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 2, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 30, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 9, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2019CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 8, 2019GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2019GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2019CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Mar 27, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance