USPTO serial 88263573
SAM4S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DONEGAN, DANIEL P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAM4S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SHIN HEUNG PRECISION CO., LTD.
Anseong-si, Gyeonggido, KR
SHIN HEUNG PRECISION CO., LTD.
Anseong-si, Gyeonggido, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jae Youn Kim
Jae Youn Kim NOVICK, KIM & LEE, PLLC3251 Old Lee HighwaySUITE 404FAIRFAX, VA 22030Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic cash registers; Point of sale systems comprising input devices for inputting data, namely, bar-code scanners, keyboards, electronic card readers, and an output device for outputting receipts and various reports, namely, receipt printers and computer monitors; Receipt printers; Magnetic coded card readers; Hand-held scanners; Fixed scanners; Scales; PDA, namely, personal digital assistants; Interactive computer kiosks comprising computers, computer hardware, computer peripherals, and computer operating software, for use in monetary transactions; Electronic equipment for point-of-sales (POS) systems, namely, point-of-sale terminals, bar code readers, optical readers, advertisement display monitors, keyboards, printers, scanners, radio transmitters, radio receivers, computer hardware, and computer operating software; Electronic card readers; Chip card readers; Card readers for credit cards; Smart card readers; Magnetic encoded card readers; Secure digital (SD) card readers; Multi-functional electronic payment terminals; Electronic payment terminal; Point-of-sale terminals for making contactless payments | ACTIVE | Apr 18, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2021 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 15, 2021 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 12, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | GSS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SU - SUBSEQUENT FINAL E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | GSSF | SU - SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | SSFR | SOU - SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2020 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2019 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 21, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 20, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |