Drawing for SMART SUTURE

USPTO serial 88265665

SMART SUTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART SUTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOVAN N JOVANOVIC

JOVAN N JOVANOVIC THE WATSON IP GROUP PLC3133 HIGHLAND DRIVE SUITE 200HUDSONVILLE, MI 49426UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005bandages for surgical use for skin wounds having mechanical hooks that penetrate the skin on either side of the wound for attachment to the skinACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 20, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 4, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 4, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 21, 2021EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 13, 2021RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Aug 20, 2021GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2021GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2021CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 25, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 9, 2021GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Feb 9, 2021GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Feb 9, 2021CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Jan 7, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 11, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 6, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 6, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 6, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 6, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 6, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 6, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 9, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance