USPTO serial 88266098
STEELCELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STEELCELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Mizrahi
Mark B. Mizrahi FREEMAN FREEMAN AND SMILEY, LLP1888 Century Park East15TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SCIENTIFIC AND RESEARCH APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, FUEL AND AIR DELIVERY SYSTEMS, COOLING WATER FLOWS TO THE STACKS, HEAT EXCHANGERS AND STEAM REFORMERS FOR REFORMING FUEL; APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR CONDUCTING, SWITCHING, TRANSFORMING, ACCUMULATING, REGULATING OR CONTROLLING THE DISTRIBUTION OR USE OF ELECTRICITY, NAMELY, ELECTROLYSERS, ELECTRIC CONVERTERS, ELECTRIC CONDUCTORS; DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ENERGY MANAGEMENT; COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PERIPHERAL DEVICES; FUEL CELLS; FUEL CELL STACKS; FUEL CELL POWER UNITS; TEST STATIONS FOR FUEL CELLS; ELECTRIC CELLS AND BATTERIES; ELECTRIC POWER UNITS, NAMELY, ELECTRICAL POWER DISTRIBUTION UNITS; ELECTRO-CHEMICAL GENERATORS FOR GENERATING ELECTRICITY, NAMELY ELECTROLYSERS; DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS IN THE FIELD OF FUEL CELLS AND ELECTROLYSERS; ENERGY REGULATORS NAMELY, ELECTRIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR ENERGY MANAGEMENT; DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF FUEL CELLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL SERVICES, NAMELY, RESEARCH AND DESIGN IN THE FIELD OF FUELS, GAS AND CHEMICAL PRODUCTION AND STORAGE; INDUSTRIAL ANALYSIS AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF FUELS, GAS AND CHEMICAL PRODUCTION AND STORAGE; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE RELATING TO ENERGY, NAMELY, PRODUCTION AND STORAGE OF FUELS, GASES AND CHEMICALS; ENERGY AUDITING; PROGRAMMING OF ENERGY MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE; ENGINEERING SERVICES; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; DESIGN SERVICES, NAMELY DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF FUEL CELLS AND ELECTROLYSERS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY AND POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CREATION, DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE OF WEBSITES FOR OTHERS; TECHNOLOGICAL SERVICES RELATING TO MANUFACTURE, NAMELY GENERATION AND STORAGE OF FUELS, GASES AND CHEMICALS; ENGINEERING CONSULTANCY RELATING TO MANUFACTURE; QUALITY CONTROL OF MANUFACTURE GOODS; INFORMATION, ADVISORY AND CONSULTANCY SERVICES RELATING TO ALL THE AFORESAID | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ceres Intellectual Property Company Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named STEELCELL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |