USPTO serial 88269157
MARIONETTE ROBOTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARIONETTE ROBOTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael M. Krieger
Michael M. Krieger KRIEGER LAW OFFICE11209 NATIONAL BLVD., #417LOS ANGELES, CA 90064UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design of robots and robotic systems for others featuring electronic, electrical and mechanical components; Testing the functionality of machines in the nature of robots and robotic systems controlled by artificial intelligence or light application of force; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems pertaining to robots and robotic systems controlled by artificial intelligence or light application of force; Programming of computer software used in robots and robotic systems, for others; Debugging computer software used in robots and robotic systems, for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GIANT.AI, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GIANT.AI, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GIANT AI, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MARIONETTE ROBOTICS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 19, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 12, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2021 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2021 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2020 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 15, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |