USPTO serial 88272551
CLEAR BLAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 20, 2019
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, DONALD
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with CLEAR BLAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WEST CHESTER, PA
ECLIPSE SURFACE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
HATFIELD, PA
West Chester, PA
West Chester, PA
West Chester, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines, namely, cleaning machines for removing surface layers from boats, masonry, namely, removal of white lines from roads, graffiti and paint from masonry surfaces; abrasive blast cleaning machines and sand blasting machines; machine tools for blast cleaning, namely, blast hoses, extension hoses, blast nozzles, nozzle holder hoses, handle assemblies; compressor cleaning machines utilizing pressurized liquids; washing equipment, namely, wet blasting equipment, machinery for stripping grime and paint and machinery for cleaning surfaces using pressurized water and equipment for stripping and cleaning surfaces, namely, wet blasting equipment; sand blasting machinery and equipment, namely, wet blasting equipment; machinery for stripping and cleaning surfaces utilizing heat and water and equipment for stripping and cleaning surfaces utilizing heat and water, namely, wet blasting equipment; structural parts and fittings thereof | ACTIVE | Jan 11, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CLEARBLAST, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ECLIPSE SURFACE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by FP Group. LLC
- Other trademarks owned by FP Group. LLC
- Other trademarks owned by FP Group. LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named CLEAR BLAST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |