USPTO serial 88272849
VIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MISCHLER, MEGAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maryann E. Licciardi
MARYANN E. LICCIARDI COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.114 WEST 47TH STREETNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROMOTING THE SALE AND CONTINUED USE OF CREDIT CARD ACCOUNTS THROUGH THE ADMINISTRATION OF INCENTIVE AWARD PROGRAMS; PROMOTING THE SALE AND CONTINUED USE OF CREDIT CARDS AND THE SALE OF GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY AWARDING DISCOUNTS AND PURCHASE POINTS FOR CREDIT CARD USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | CASH REPLACEMENT RENDERED BY CREDIT CARD; CREDIT CARD AUTHORIZATION SERVICES; PROVIDING REBATES FOR CREDIT CARD USE AS PART OF A CUSTOMER LOYALTY PROGRAM; CREDIT CARD PAYMENT PROCESSING SERVICES; ISSUING OF CREDIT CARDS; CREDIT CARD TRANSACTION PROCESSING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |