Drawing for TRNQL

USPTO serial 88272966

TRNQL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRNQL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew Sachs

Andrew Sachs SUTTON SACHS MEYER PLLC14 PENN PLAZA SUITE 1315NEW YORK, NY 10122UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Topical herbal extracts for cosmetic purposes; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic useACTIVE—
005Herbal supplements; Nutritional supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 16, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 15, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 14, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 15, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 16, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 21, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 21, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 1, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 4, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance