Drawing for MULTITASK PLATFORM

USPTO serial 88273082

MULTITASK PLATFORM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUONG, ANGELA GAW
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MULTITASK PLATFORM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Leonard

Michael J. Leonard FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP997 LENOX DRIVE, BLDG. 3LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ 08648-2311UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007machines and apparatus for the textile industry, namely, textile weaving and spinning machines, not included in other classes; machines and apparatus for the textile industry, namely, parts and accessories for textile weaving and spinning machines, not included in other classes, namely, heat exchangers; leather-working machines; sewing machines and replacement and structural parts therefor; pedal drives for sewing machines; cutting blades for textile machines; industrial robots; parts of industrial robots, namely, robotic arms for industrial purposes; loading and unloading machines, namely, industrial robots for conveyance and replacement and structural parts and fittings therefor; semiconductor manufacturing machines; machines for bonding electronic components, namely, circuit board assembly machines, and soldering machines; surface mounting machines for mounting electronic components on to printed circuit boards and replacement and structural parts therefor; servomotors; air compressors; grease boxes being parts of machines; automatic warehousing systems comprised of automated machines for loading and unloading cargo to and from racks of shelving; loading-unloading machines and apparatus; material handling machines, namely, automatic pallet dispensing machines; handling apparatus for loading and unloading, namely, loading and unloading machines; elevator equipment, namely, elevators and parts thereofACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2020MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 30, 2020ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 29, 2020EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 9, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance