Drawing for VORTEX MOTION

USPTO serial 88273743

VORTEX MOTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VORTEX MOTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Di Li

Di Li DI LI LAW, P.C.17700 CASTLETON STSTE 353CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91748

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Centrifugal mills; Crushers for kitchen use, electric; Electric food blenders; Electric fruit presses for household use; Food processors, electric; Fruit presses, electric, for household purposes; Kitchen grinders, electric; Machines, namely, crushers, impact mills, breakers, pulverizers, mixers and blenders and parts therefor, for industrial and commercial applications; Power-operated flour mills; Whisks, electric, for household purposesACTIVE—
011Coffee bean roasters, electronic cookers, cooking stoves, electric bread toasters, electric kettles, bread-making machines, electric cooking pots, beverage cooling and heating machines, air fryersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 24, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 12, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2019GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 2, 2019GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 2, 2019CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 29, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 2, 2019PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 19, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 6, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 4, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 4, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 4, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance