USPTO serial 88274916
LUV NOTES!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PIERCE, ALEXANDRA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUV NOTES!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Abraham Lichy
Abraham Lichy The Lichy Law Firm, P.C.222 East 68th StreetNew York, NY 10065UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Novelty toys for playing jokes; Novelty noisemaker toys for parties; Novelty plush toys for parties; Plush toys; Toy cars; Toy figures; Toy foam novelty items, namely, foam fingers and hands; Toy action figures; Toy and novelty face masks; Bingo cards; Game cards; Playing cards; Playing cards and card games; PVC toy figures; Stuffed and plush toys; Toy glow sticks | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2022 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |